India's Union Cabinet approved two programmes on 4 November. One is ₹14,500 crore of viability gap funding for grid-scale energy storage. The other is ₹2,814 crore of capital support for critical mineral processing2, 1. Information and Broadcasting Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw announced both at the Cabinet briefing2, 4.

The storage scheme runs from FY27 to FY311. It is meant to bring 92 GWh of storage that is yet to be commissioned into the grid1, 4. The mineral scheme runs for five years and is limited to four processing plants2. The government says the VGF will help improve the financial viability of the storage projects1.

Batteries are 30 GWh of the 92 GWh

The target is 60 GWh of pumped hydro storage, 30 GWh of battery energy storage systems (BESS) and 2 GWh of alternative storage technologies1. Total estimated investment is ₹97,600 crore1. Batteries are 30 GWh of the total, not 92 GWh1.

The government says the 92 GWh equals 170% of India's present grid-scale storage capacity1. Its stated requirement is 411 GWh by FY321. Capacity will be allocated through tariff-based competitive bidding1. Public and private electricity distribution companies are eligible for VGF on BESS and pumped hydro projects1. Projects using alternative technologies will be implemented by public and private sector entities1.

The reports do not give a VGF amount per kWh, a split of the ₹14,500 crore across the three technologies, the implementing agency or the first bid dates1, 4. Anujesh Dwivedi, a partner at Deloitte India, said the focus on pumped hydro alongside batteries and other technologies is "the key highlight of the new VGF Scheme"1.

A 40% domestic content rule for batteries

BESS projects supported by the scheme will face a minimum domestic content requirement of 40%1. The government says this will complement existing supply-side incentives for battery manufacturing1. The rule arrives before the supply chain does. A report launched by the Ministry of Heavy Industries found that Indian capacity covers less than 3% of the cathode, anode and electrolyte volumes projected for 20323. It found no known domestic output of separators or battery-grade copper foil3.

Indian costs for those five component groups run 18% to 61% above imported equivalents3. Components make up roughly 76% of cell manufacturing costs, the report found3. It pointed to China's near-total dominance of global battery component supply3. The International Energy Agency puts China's share of lithium refining at around 70% and of cobalt refining above 75%5.

Neither the government's statement on the scheme nor the NETRA report says whether the 40% test applies to cells, modules or the whole system1, 3. India's battery demand is projected to rise from about 33 GWh in 2025 to 236 GWh in 2032 and close to 600 GWh by 2037, according to the NETRA report3. Rahul Walawalkar, founder and president of NETRA, said "cell makers take 18 to 24 months to qualify a supplier"3. He added that "decisions taken by March 2027 will decide whether the cell plants coming online by March 2029 can buy qualified materials made in India"3.

Four plants, two minerals, least-cost bids

The mineral scheme gives a 30% capital subsidy on eligible investment2. It covers two lithium plants of at least 30 kt each and two nickel plants of at least 50 kt each, where kt means kilotonnes2. The plants will turn lithium and nickel ore or intermediate products into high-purity compounds2. Cobalt is expected to be recovered as a by-product of nickel2. Support is capped at ₹500 crore per lithium beneficiary and ₹900 crore per nickel beneficiary2.

Bidders first pass a technical qualification. Qualified applicants then bid on the capex support they need. Two beneficiaries per mineral are picked on the lowest support sought2. Money is paid in three tranches tied to milestones2. The announcement named no beneficiaries and gave no bid dates2.

It also left the units open. The reported statement does not say whether the 30 kt and 50 kt capacities refer to ore or to finished product2. Nor does it define what spending counts as eligible investment, or whether local content or offtake conditions apply2.

Feedstock is the constraint. India has auctioned 733 mineral blocks, but only 125 were in operation as of August 20266. The gap from award to production exceeds seven years for major and critical mineral blocks, according to concept notes shared with states6. The same notes list "limited domestic processing capacity for high purity strategic elements" among the main challenges6. India's ₹34,300-crore National Critical Mineral Mission targets 50 overseas mines by 20315.

What to watch

For battery buyers, the first signal is likely to be the storage bid documents, which should define the 40% domestic content test and any per-kWh VGF ceiling. For mineral buyers, the signal is the first lithium and nickel plant tender. It will show which groups can bring ore or intermediate feedstock to India2, 1.

Two more threads are worth tracking. The government is considering a dedicated scheme for battery component makers, The Economic Times reported3. And Indian companies are already building materials capacity. Himadri Speciality Chemicals plans ₹1,125 crore of lithium iron phosphate investment as part of a ₹1,613 crore programme it expects to complete by the fourth quarter of the next financial year7.